What’s the right amount of time for a birth mother to change her mind about putting her baby up for adoption?
The adoption process in Pennsylvania is being scrutinized for potential updates, but one bill that could halve the time birth mothers have to decide against adoption has been particularly controversial.
By Elizabeth Lepro and Lauren Rosenblatt | PublicSource | July 7, 2016
When Priscilla Sharp gave birth to her daughter, she was startled when the baby was put in her arms.
Moments after the nurse handed her the child by accident, a nun came by to carry the baby girl away.
“I had no choice. I had no home, I had no job, I had no money.”
Sharp, now a 71-year-old blogger living in State College, had chosen to put her baby up for adoption in 1964 and was not permitted to see the child. Sharp said she’s held on to the pain of that moment for 50 years.
Attorney of the Year, Lifetime Achievement and Lawyer on the Fast Track Awards
Keynote Address of Frank P. Cervone, Executive Director, Support Center for Child Advocates
Thank you Hank. We congratulate Legal Editor Hank Grezlak for his recent promotion, announced today in The Legal. His reach has grown tremendously, clearly a sign that SOMEONE in American Lawyer Media likes him! As reported today, “Hank Grezlak’s role with ALM as Regional Editor-in-Chief for the Northeast—including The Legal Intelligencer—has been expanded to include oversight of all regional ALM brands including the New York Law Journal, The Recorder, Texas Lawyer, Daily Report and the Daily Business Review … and Sesame Street, The National Enquirer, Saturday Night Live and All Twitter feeds everywhere.” Talk about Fast Track!!
Seriously, The Legal has been a tremendous partner of the public interest law community, and a friend of Child Advocates, promoting our events and helping us to invite others to the work. More importantly The Legal Intelligencer remains a vital element of Pennsylvania’s Fourth Estate, speaking truth to power, pressing for and creating accountability in our legal institutions. All of the journalists and leaders involved in ALM and The Legal Intelligencer – please let’s recognize these fine colleagues!
White House Foster Care & Technology Hackathon
By Frank P. Cervone
The White House Foster Care & Technology Hackathon engaged the challenge of using computer technology and the Internet to solve complex legal and social service problems facing children, families and professionals in the child welfare system. Hosted by the Administration on Children and Families (ACF), the child welfare arm of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the gathering convened more than 150 lawyers, techies, and former foster youth at the White House for two intense days of brainstorming, software design and information sharing. The sessions were held at The White House and Reagan Federal Office Building on May 26-27, 2016 and led by ACF Commissioner Rafael Lopez, White House Policy Advisor Molly Dillon, and HHS Chief Technology Officer Susannah Fox.
The White House Hackathon builds upon work of two Children’s Rights Summit held in December 2014 and 2015 in Silicon Valley, and focused on the interaction between technology and children’s rights. Workgroups in this current session developed digital solutions and legal principles to address information sharing across the child welfare system. Links to the proceedings can be found at:
Commissioner Lopez challenged the group to imagine trying “something dramatically different to change a system we know does not yield better results for children and families in the system. How do we engage, across multiple sectors, the kind of talent and creativity that we need to rethink and reimagine foster care in America?”
The Obama Administration has prioritized digital access to help fill gaps in knowledge and service in a wide variety of fields, while promoting cross-disciplinary and international participation in creative web-based problem-solving. Other Hackathons have engaged civic activists, technology experts, and entrepreneurs to build tools that help others in their own neighborhoods, experimenting with alternative ways to engage citizens in civic discourse. The 2016 Foster Care & Technology Hackathon featured more than 20 former foster youth and foster parents and also included a software development team from Romania. With tools such as digital information lockers and all-new software platforms, workgroups “hacked” on topics that included substance exposed newborns, homeless youth, foster family recruitment, youth empowerment, and preventing unplanned teen pregnancy.
Inside the larger group, about 20 lawyers in the “Legal Hackathon” met to explore the legal challenges to applying technology in child welfare. Angela Vigil, Pro Bono Partner at Baker & McKenzie and leader of the Legal Hackathon, observed that “information about and related to children and families in the child welfare system is sometimes shared that should have been protected, and information is sometimes held that should have been shared in the child welfare system. These failures must be addressed in order to better serve the children the child welfare system was designed to serve.”
Key stakeholders include children, biological parents, siblings and relatives, foster parents, courts, caseworkers, and both lawyer and non-lawyer advocates for children and their caregivers.
Vigil added that “a principled framework should govern the access, protection and flow of information among and between these parties. Yet no such holistic framework exists — although there are certainly laws that aim to govern some of this information access and protection.”
Seeking a legal and ethical framework to govern the flow of information between and among the stake holders in the child welfare system, the Legal Workgroup drafted a “Bill of Rights for Information-Sharing in Child Welfare”. Key tenets include:
- Children in care are entitled to access, control, protection and preservation of their information. (for example, it should be a rebuttable presumption that children get access to full information about their siblings in developmentally appropriate and trauma-informed way).
- Electronic information-sharing between agencies is authorized and expected where it is necessary to serve the children’s interests well.
- Caregivers need the information necessary to parent effectively. States need to be transparent about rules of information-sharing with caregivers.
- Caseworkers need unlimited access to all categories of information electronically, real-time, accurate, across sectors
- Courts must have access to all relevant information necessary to make decisions about the children before them. Courts must insist on stakeholders bringing them everything they need.
Ira Lustbader, Legal Director of Children’s Rights, Inc. recalled that “in every single reform campaign or civil rights lawsuit” that he had been part of “these issues of data and tech have been sources of profound frustration and profound potential to solve problems.” He said that “information on kids should be accessible across sectors, because it will lead to better outcomes. There’s a web of state and federal legal barriers, along with technological ones, that constrain the open access of information for kids across sectors. Some states have MOUs [Memorandum of Understanding] and other approaches to break down barriers” that we can promote and learn from.
The Legal Workgroup plans to continue its efforts in a series of conference calls and other work together over the next six months. Over the next few months, members of the group will invite comment and improvement by experts and advocates across the nation. The result will be a platform upon which local, state and federal law development might be guided to better serve the children and other stakeholders in the child welfare system in the United States.
Holiday Toy Drive Information:
For many of the kids we serve, the holidays are difficult. Some children may be separated from their parents, others from their siblings. At least 90% come from families living below the federal poverty level. All have experienced significant trauma that taints the warm holiday season.
We invite you to make the holidays brighter for these boys and girls.
Join our Holiday Toy Drive! We offer many ways to participate. Please read each volunteer opportunity carefully, as some changes have been made this year.
Coordinate a Child Advocates Toy Drive at work, among friends and family, at your child’s school, or at your church, synagogue or mosque. We will send you the names and ages of children – you tell us how many – on adhesive labels that can be distributed to your donors. We suggest a minimum of 10 children. When you’re done, deliver the toys to us or we’ll pick them up.
Buy gifts for our children (Birth to 21). We especially need gifts for teenagers. Gift cards are an easy way to give to this age group and our teens love them! Ideas: American Eagle, Bath & Body Works, Five Below, Foot Locker, Old Navy, Target,Urban Outfitters, movie theaters, restaurants, etc. Click HERE for gift ideas for all ages.
Amazon Wish List. Purchase gifts or clothing from our client specific requested holiday list.
Volunteer at our Toy Drive headquarters (location to be determined) to help sort and bag toys during the weeks preceding Delivery Day.
Help deliver toys on December 17th – Delivery Day. To protect the safety and well-being of the children we serve, we are requiring all Toy Drive Drivers to complete a background check. If you have completed a background check in the past year, please send a copy of your clearance to Moira Mulroney or fax to 267-546-9201, attention Toy Drive Clearance. Child Advocates volunteer attorneys and 2015 Toy Drive Drivers do not have to undergo another background check but will need to contact Moira Mulroney to register. To complete a background check please click HERE.
Sponsor a needy family or teen on a larger scale. Many of our clients’ families are impoverished with large sibling groups or special needs children, and may require more than toys.
Sorters, Donors and Toy Drive Coordinators, click HERE to fill out our volunteer interest form.
**Things to remember: The deadline to delivery toys to our Toy Drive headquarters is Wednesday, December 14th, 2016. Please do not wrap gifts, give candy, or weapon-themed toys.
If you have any questions, please contact email@example.com, 267-546-9208.
May 3, 2016 Philly.com
By: Julia Terruso
Seven child-welfare workers in Philadelphia were fired in February and March in connection with at least two false reports about home visits, according to state officials.
Rachel Kostelac, a spokeswoman for the state Department of Human Services, said three were workers from Community Umbrella Agencies contracted by the city to handle cases, and four were with subcontracted foster-care agencies.
The report of the firings followed remarks Friday by a state DHS official, who said child-welfare workers in Philadelphia had falsified reports in response to high caseloads.
Advocacy in a Dynamic Child Welfare System
The Legal Intelligencer April 24th, 2016
Written by Tracey Thomasey
Since 2012, the Philadelphia child welfare system has been transitioning to a new model of service delivery using Community Umbrella Agencies (CUA) to work with families through an Improving Outcomes for Children (IOC) initiative. IOC has moved responsibility for foster care and in-home family services to 10 CUAs that are based in local communities so that families and providers can build familiarity with each other.
The initiative was launched with the first two CUAs opening in 2012 in North Philadelphia neighborhoods where child welfare caseloads have been the highest and most challenging. As of fall 2014, all 10 CUAs were fully operational, so that all new cases and most of the existing cases are now being serviced by CUA workers.
As with any significant system reform, the shift to community-based agencies has had challenges, including a high turnover rate among CUA workers, difficulty sharing information between entities, as well as monetary and social service resources that are inadequate to meet the needs of a growing child welfare system. We must ask ourselves: In a dynamic child welfare system, how do advocates assist children, families and the system in reaching their individual and collective potentials?